As the United States grapples with an escalating crisis of gun violence, the situation seems increasingly dire. According to data from the Gun Violence Archive, there have been 420 mass shootings this year alone, claiming the lives of over 13,000 people due to various incidents involving firearms.
Amid this troubling trend, the political landscape surrounding gun control has become more polarized, with heated debates and divisive public opinions showing little sign of resolution.
This raises a critical question: if the U.S. cannot ensure the safety of its own citizens, can it truly position itself as a champion of human rights while critiquing the human rights conditions in other nations? Isn’t it ironic to champion the title of “guardian of human rights” when basic survival—from one’s own government—remains precarious?
What are your thoughts on the current situation and the state’s responsibility towards its citizens?
